When we negotiate do we see bigger picture of things, do we see it from ecological point of view. Do we see things from perspective of me, the person who we negotiate and the best possible influence to the environment (the ecology).
Negotiation is not about getting what we want , negotiation is about getting the best result for both the supplier and the customer , to gain the win win solutions.
It may not be that we have to win all the time.
Negotiation has a lot to do with making sure that we don't become nasty or the person we negotiate become nasty. It may not always be the case but always thrive to find the balance.
If we can let someone win and not bruise their ego and it can benefit the long run of ecology perhaps that is the one thing need to be considered.
There is definitely a fine line between assertive before we cross the board to become plain nasty. It is very easy to caught up in a heated negotiation that the result would turn out ugly for both sides. Just because we feel that the other person should pay! This is his fault!
Are we still in the land of right or wrong? Or should we move to a different belief? Belief that we thrive for the ecological balance and for long term relationship.
Thrive to negotiate where the production capability will sustain for future generation.
It is very easy to be in negotiation where we sacrifice our golden goose (long term potential relationship) just to gain additional golden egg by slaying the goose one day earlier. You will gain short term gratification that ends a relationship.
It is very important to negotiate that last for good.
Negotiation is not about getting what we want , negotiation is about getting the best result for both the supplier and the customer , to gain the win win solutions.
It may not be that we have to win all the time.
Negotiation has a lot to do with making sure that we don't become nasty or the person we negotiate become nasty. It may not always be the case but always thrive to find the balance.
If we can let someone win and not bruise their ego and it can benefit the long run of ecology perhaps that is the one thing need to be considered.
There is definitely a fine line between assertive before we cross the board to become plain nasty. It is very easy to caught up in a heated negotiation that the result would turn out ugly for both sides. Just because we feel that the other person should pay! This is his fault!
Are we still in the land of right or wrong? Or should we move to a different belief? Belief that we thrive for the ecological balance and for long term relationship.
Thrive to negotiate where the production capability will sustain for future generation.
It is very easy to be in negotiation where we sacrifice our golden goose (long term potential relationship) just to gain additional golden egg by slaying the goose one day earlier. You will gain short term gratification that ends a relationship.
It is very important to negotiate that last for good.